Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Constructivist Research in the Classroom? You Bet!

A book recommended to me by some members of our literacy curriculum team found its way back into my hands the other day.  I had skimmed through it earlier this year in the middle of a research unit (great time to be learning, right?) and could tell that it was something I wanted to go back and revisit when I had time to process on it and really think. "Energize Research  Reading and Writing" by Christopher Lehman is a game-changing text . . . it's only about 140 pages (always a bonus!) but it is a paradigm shifting text that is WELL worth your time if you teach intermediate or middle level students.



If you have followed my blog for any amount of time, you know I am a huge believer in having students "construct" their own meaning.  You know as well as I do that we can "teach" students 24/7, but if we fail to address the "learning", we are wasting our breath.

I think this is the reason I always dread "The Research Project" in 4th grade.  I feel I work VERY hard during the process, and I'm just not sure what kind of learning really occurs.  The students are players in the process instead of moderating their own game.  Students are more concerned about doing what the teacher has established as "The Process" that I truly question what learning takes place.  "The Research Project" has taken on different forms through my years of teaching, but it always involves a few key elements:

  • Teacher selects a topic (or "category"--like biographies)
  • Students work step by step to go through "The Research Project"--usually involving notes, drafts, revisions, and publishing.
  • Students who struggle get the most teacher time and the process is completed hand over hand to make sure the steps are followed.  
  • The teacher works very hard trying to keep everyone "caught up".
  • Students follow the steps obediently (relatively!) so they end up with a finished product.
Sound familiar to you?  It's certainly how I learned to research.  I remember index cards.  Losing index cards.  Sorting index cards.  I remember getting halfway finished with a project and realizing that I now DESPISED the topic and just wanted to finish it.  I remember red pen marks pointing out citation errors and weak introductions and insufficient evidence.  What I don't remember is WHY we were doing it!  I certainly didn't enjoy it.

I think this is what made this text so meaningful for me.  Lehman is constantly reinforcing the idea that the students need to be the center of this process.  The process of researching can be as simple as finding the answer to an "I wonder..." question or as complicated as a lengthy paper and presentation. This book helped me completely change my perspective of what research IS, how to help students deepen their understanding of the research process, and how to work collaboratively with our students to help them develop the passion for learning that I think (and hope) we all want our students to have.  

One line from the text that caught my eye from the beginning was, " . . . it begins by embracing the uncertainty all of us feel when first researching a topic, then teaching budding researchers to do the things we have learned to do." (p. 9) As teachers, we don't like things to be uncomfortable.  We don't like to "not know" where things are headed.  We need to let go of this and jump in WITH our students and embrace the messiness.

Does this mean chaos?  Not at all. In fact, Lehman stresses what we know to be true about good teaching.  We must teach students to slow down and think. . . to visualize . . . to recognize and use academic vocabulary . . . to investigate text structures . . . too revise and improve upon earlier work.

Another fantastic feature that runs throughout this book is his great examples of "teacher talk".  Do you have a hard time imagining what this might look like in your classroom?  Reading his narrative will help.  He also stresses differentiation throughout the text.  How might this be adapted for "experienced" or "emergent" researchers"  He explains clearly how to make these changes.

So . . . I am not doing the book justice, but if your district is like mine and is requiring a great deal more work in reading and writing with informational texts, I truly believe this text might help you rethink past practices.  I know "research" is starting to look different in my classroom, and I hope to do an even better job next year!  Watch for more posts on this topic this year as we dig in!


8 comments:

  1. I just finished reading this book- it was fabulous! It gave me tons of ideas to rethink & change my writing unit, but also got me to thinking on how to tweak my reading unit to help support this work. I LOVE having students make meaning/ construct their own learning and this book has helped me to see some ways in which I can help that happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad someone else happened across the book! Hopefully more people will dig in after seeing this. It really is filled with ideas, isn't it?!?!

      Delete
  2. I just read your guest post about problem solving. I love the idea of a pocket chart full of word problems. What do you think about adding this next to it:

    http://pinterest.com/pin/145804106659208477/

    Mary Kate
    Windy City Learning

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Mary Kate. I've seen that pin! It's a great idea!

      Delete
  3. Seriously an awesome book review - I don't often want to go out and buy a Professional Development book like that. I totally agree about have students construct their own meaning. It's tough to do because it goes against what everyone has done for so long!

    I am your newest follower! Come stop by if you get a chance :)

    Lauren
    The Sweetest Thing
    Follow me on Bloglovin'!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post! This would work well with inquiry based learning. Love it!!

    Jennifer
    Mrs. Laffin's Laughings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It certainly would! Thanks, Jennifer! Now...to put it all into action! YIKES!

      Delete